WebThe IUS-12 exhibited limited multidimensionality indicating that only the total score provides meaningful interpretation. The IUS-12 demonstrated good construct validity (with DASS-21, MCQ-30, and PSWQ), good internal consistency, as well as good test-retest reliability over 12-weeks. The IUS-12 demonstrated responsivity to treatment following ... WebMar 1, 2016 · The PSWQ-10 demonstrates good to excellent internal consistency across a range of diagnostic groups (i.e., anxiety disorders, trauma-and stress-related disorders, and obsessive-compulsive...
Penn State Worry Questionnaire (PSWQ) Blueprint
WebAug 12, 2024 · The scores from each item are summed together to yield a total score that ranges from 0-42, with higher scores reflecting higher levels of worry (Chorpita et al., … WebScoring and Interpretation Information Scores range from 16 to 80 with higher scores indicative of higher levels of trait worry. Scores can be in the following severity ranges. - … ratio\\u0027s 4s
Cynthia L. Turk 1 3 2 - Kent State University
WebSubsequently, item scores are summed to yield a total score. Total scores range from 0 to 42, with higher scores indicating greater tendency to worry. PSWQ-C has also been found to have good internal reliability, with Cronbach alpha coefficients ranging from .89 to .91 (for community samples and a Cronbach alpha coefficient of .82 for a large ... WebFeb 9, 2016 · The Penn State Worry Questionnaire Meyer TJ, et al. [7] has been a largely used instrument for the study of worry across numerous researches. ... The ROC analysis assessed the ability of the PSWQ total score to correctly identify 30 patients with GAD from a sample that also included 60 patients with other anxiety disorders (namely, Obsessive ... WebScores range from 16 to 80 with higher scores indicative of higher levels of trait worry. A total raw score is given as output which is converted into three percentiles, comparing the total score to three different samples: An adult community sample (n = 244) showing the client’s score in relation to the normal population (Gillis, Haaga ... ratio\u0027s 4t